Water woes

Special election scheduled May 7 to repeal LOSST

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

It's going to the polls.

Recently, Clarke County Board of Supervisors received a petition from a group of citizens to repeal the Local Option Sales and Services Tax (LOSST).

A special election was scheduled May 7 to vote on the following public measure to repeal the tax in the areas of Clarke County where it is imposed.

This includes LOSST 2008 with the city of Woodburn, LOSST 2009 with the city of Osceola and LOSST 2010 with the city of Murray.

The special election could cost the county approximately $10,000.

"It's important, I think, for the reservoir commission to get some information out about the importance of the local option sales tax to the project," said David W. Beck, executive director of Southern Iowa Resource Conservation and Development Area, during Clarke County Reservoir Commission's (CCRC) meeting Jan. 10.

Water project

The special election is in response to CCRC's Squaw Creek Watershed project, which will provide a water supply for Osceola and Southern Iowa Rural Water Association (SIRWA) with an 816-acre lake that provides 2.2 million gallons of water per day.

The total project cost for the reservoir in the Squaw Creek Watershed is estimated at $35.5 million. Funding the project includes many sources, especially LOSST.

Basically, in the special election, in order to keep the sales tax in place, people would have to vote "no" on the ballot, or more specifically, if they are in favor of the Squaw Creek Watershed project.

If they think LOSST should be repealed, or are against the water project, they may vote "yes."

Jack Cooley, a former Clarke County Supervisor, decided to stay on the CCRC as the commission's representative from the supervisors.

Cooley said it was the only committee he chose to remain on, specifically to see the water project through. He called the special election "the most important election in the history of Clarke County."

Questions addressed

During the Jan. 10 meeting, a question and answer sheet from the CCRC public hearing held in December, was made available.

The first question addressed on the sheet was "Will property taxes increase?"

The answer was "The project financial plan does not include any component that relies on a property-tax increase. About 93 percent of the project funding is currently identified."

Previous Page|1|||

Comments

Total Comments
0

View/Add Comments

There have been no comments made about this story.

Reader Poll

What type of May weather do you prefer?

90-degree heat
Snow
Rain
70 to 80 degrees